Recently, the Trump Administration has been focused on trade, in particular with China. This is not surprising, given that China is the United States’ largest trading partner and reportedly the source of nearly half our total trade deficit.
What is the Trump Administration trying to achieve?
- Free and fair trade with China.
- Correcting any tariffs that disadvantage the U.S. For instance, there is a 25 percent tariff on U.S. automobiles sold in China - while foreign cars sold in the U.S. face only a 2.5 percent tariff.
- Eliminating unfair trade practices particularly in intellectual property practices, where U.S. companies entered China and formed joint ventures with Chinese firms only to realize that the latter were leaking their intelligence to the government or to their competitors.
- Creating more jobs for the American middle class.
- Rectifying the wage gap of cheap labor abroad versus the U.S. workers’ wages. Cheap overseas labor resulted in a hollowing out of certain industry jobs in the U.S. The cheap labor could have been a result of the under-valued Chinese Yuan, which is a currency that is quasi-fixed by the Peoples’ Bank of China.
- Revitalizing and solidifying America as an economic superpower.
- Avoiding heavy reliance on foreign imports, particularly with China as it has rapidly grown to be the second-highest GDP power in the world, and is still growing faster than the U.S.
Will the U.S. be successful in achieving this?
My View: The administration’s efforts to highlight and correct certain unfair trade practices have been embraced and everyone would agree we want a level-playing field in trade.
However, it is the approach that the current Administration is taking that the market is more cautious about. President Trump’s approach has been to start by raising tariffs on Chinese goods. This punitive action has the potential to spark a trade war, and indeed China retaliated by slapping tariffs back on certain U.S. goods.
Not only that, raising tariffs to protect certain industries in the U.S. goes against free trade – and is taking a protectionist trade approach. This is just a temporary fix, as we learned when this same scenario played out with the U.S. and Japan in the 1980’s. Worse yet, analysts fear that higher input prices could suppress production in the U.S., ultimately resulting in fewer jobs and a weaker economy.
The market would have preferred to see a reduction in tariffs as the solution to the unfair trade practices, perhaps through a more diplomatic approach, as this is truly much more consistent with free and fair trade principles.
Keep in mind that globalization and free trade still provide a basic framework that ensures economic dependence around the world and an incentive for countries to avoid military friction. The market understands the Administration’s objective, but is confused about its strategy. Until there is a more solid plan aimed at fixing the root of the trade imbalance, the financial market instability may linger.
For more City National commentary, subscribe to our newsletters.
If we can help you with any Foreign Exchange needs, please email email@example.com or call (800) 447 4133.
|The information in this report was compiled by the staff at City National Bank from data and sources believed to be reliable but City National Bank makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. The opinions expressed, together with any estimate or projection given, constitute the judgment of the author as of the date of the report. City National Bank has no obligation to update, modify or amend this report or to otherwise notify a reader in the event any information stated, opinion expressed, matter discussed, estimate or projection changes or is determined to be inaccurate. This report is intended to be a source of general information. It is not to be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any financial instrument. It should not be relied upon as specific investment advice directed to the reader’s specific investment objectives. Any financial instrument discussed in this report may not be suitable for the reader. Each reader must make his or her own investment decision, using an independent advisor if prudent, based on his or her own investment objective and financial situation. Prices and availability of financial instruments are subject to change without notice. Financial instruments denominated in a foreign currency are subject to exchange rate risk in addition to the risk of the investment. City National Bank (and its clients or associated persons) may, at times, engage in transactions in a manner inconsistent with this report and, with respect to particular securities and financial instruments discussed, may buy from or sell to clients or others on a principal basis. Past performance is not necessarily an indication of future results. This report may not be reproduced, distributed or further published by any person without the written consent of City National Bank. Please cite source when quoting.|