outlook for oil

(Note: this is a condensed and updated version of a Special Bulletin published on December 18, 2015)

Producers, consumers, and investors have witnessed a stunning 70% drop in the price of oil over the last 18 months. This has resulted in huge declines in employment in the energy and mining industries, and lower gasoline prices for consumers. It has also led to a significant increase in economic pressure among those countries heavily dependent on oil revenues for government spending.

In every free market, price is dictated by supply and demand. In 2015, demand growth was strong, but not as strong as one would expect given the freefall in prices. Over half of the annual growth in demand for oil in the latter part of the last decade came from China. As a result, China’s much-publicized economic slowdown clearly has had a negative impact on overall demand.

The rise of shale oil production over the past decade in the United States has greatly diminished OPEC’s ability to set prices in the marketplace. Despite falling prices, OPEC has maintained production levels in order to force higher-cost producers out of the market. So far, this strategy has largely failed, as production has remained relatively stable.


Congress recently passed a $1.1 trillion spending measure that provides tax credits for the use of alternative energy sources (e.g., solar, wind) and lifts the 40-year-old oil export ban. In the long run, increased use of renewable energy sources could crimp demand for fossil fuels, but in the near term, it should result in an increase in domestic oil production. North America’s growing production capacity has diminished OPEC’s price-setting ability on global oil markets, and this trend is likely to continue as domestic production increases.

The decline in oil prices has resulted in massive global rig reductions, most notably in the U.S. and Canada. International rig count is down only 16%, primarily because of larger/longer projects and because national governments need oil revenues to balance their budgets. Despite the sharp reduction in rig count, U.S. crude oil production is still high. Producers have become increasingly efficient by using newer drilling techniques and focusing on core acreage areas. They are pumping more from fewer rigs.

With large debt burdens that require servicing, oil exploration companies have chosen to keep the taps flowing in order to generate revenue. Shutting down rigs and cutting jobs has allowed them to lower their breakeven prices, but most U.S. shale oil producers are losing money at the current price of oil ($31.41 per barrel as of January 11, 2016). The excess supply is rapidly filling the capacity of storage facilities. This is an unsustainable situation, and production is beginning to decline as smaller producers exit the business.

We believe that overall weak global demand and limited excess capacity will constrain production in the near term, helping to keep a floor under prices. On the other hand, the imminent introduction of Iranian oil onto global markets and the ability of U.S. producers to restart production at the first sign of higher prices is likely to prevent oil from rising much above the $50 to $55 per barrel for the foreseeable future.



Investment and Insurance Products: 
• Are Not insured by the FDIC or any other federal government agency 
• Are Not deposits of or guaranteed by a Bank or any Bank Affiliate 
• May Lose Value


Important Disclosures

The information presented does not involve the rendering of personalized investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. This presentation is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell, any of the securities mentioned herein.

Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts, and other forward-looking statements, which do not reflect actual results and are based primarily upon a hypothetical set of assumptions applied to certain historical financial information. Certain information has been provided by third-party sources and, although believed to be reliable, it has not been independently verified, and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed.

Any opinions, projections, forecasts, and forward-looking statements presented herein are valid as on the date of this document and are subject to change.

There are inherent risks with equity investing. These risks include, but are not limited to, stock market, manager, or investment style. Stock markets tend to move in cycles, with periods of rising prices and periods of falling prices. Investing in international markets carries risks such as currency fluctuation, regulatory risks, economic and political instability. Emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors as well as increased volatility, lower trading volume, and less liquidity. Emerging markets can have greater custodial and operational risks, and less developed legal and accounting systems than developed markets.

There are inherent risks with fixed income investing. These risks may include interest rate, call, credit, market, inflation, government policy, liquidity, or junk bond. When interest rates rise, bond prices fall. The yields and market values of municipal securities may be more affected by changes in tax rates and policies than similar income-bearing taxable securities. Certain investors’ incomes may be subject to the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) and taxable gains are also possible. Investments in below-investment-grade debt securities and unrated securities of similar credit quality, commonly known as “junk bonds” or “high-yield securities,” may be subject to increased interest, credit, and liquidity risks.

Investments in emerging markets bonds may be substantially more volatile, and substantially less liquid, than the bonds of governments, government agencies, and government-owned corporations located in more developed foreign markets. Emerging markets bonds can have greater custodial and operational risks, and less developed legal and accounting systems than developed markets.

Investments in Master Limited Partnerships (MLP) are susceptible to concentration risk, illiquidity, exposure to potential volatility, tax reporting complexity, fiscal policy and market risk. Investors of MLPs are subject to increased tax reporting requirements. MLP investors typically receive a complicated Schedule K-1 form rather than Form 1099. MLPs may not be appropriate investments for tax-advantaged accounts because of potential negative tax consequences (Unrelated Business Tax Income).

As with any investment strategy, there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be met, and investors may lose money.

Returns include the reinvestment of interest and dividends.

Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Diversification may not protect against market loss or risk.

Past performance is no guarantee of future performance.

Index Definitions

The Standard and Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500) is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 common stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation to represent U.S. equity performance.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average Index is a price-weighted average of 30 significant stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ.

The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Latin America Index captures large and mid-cap representation across five Emerging Markets (EM) countries* in Latin America. With 119 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country.

*EM Latin America countries include: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru.

The Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index is a market value-weighted index which covers the U.S. non-investment grade fixed-rate debt market. The index is composed of U.S. dollar-denominated corporate debt in Industrial, Utility, and Finance sectors with a minimum $150 million par amount outstanding and a maturity greater than one year. The index includes reinvestment of income.

The NASDAQ is a global electronic marketplace for buying and selling securities, as well as the benchmark index for U.S. technology stocks. NASDAQ was created by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) to enable investors to trade securities on a computerized, speedy, and transparent system. The term “NASDAQ” is also used to refer to the NASDAQ Composite, an index of more than 3,000 stocks listed on the NASDAQ exchange that includes the world’s foremost technology and biotech companies.

The STOXX Europe 600 Index is derived from the STOXX Europe Total Market Index (TMI) and is a subset of the STOXX Global 1800 Index. With a fixed number of 600 components, the STOXX Europe 600 Index represents large, mid and small capitalization companies across 18 countries of the European region: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

The Bloomberg Commodity Index (BCOM) is calculated on an excess return basis and reflects commodity futures price movements. The index rebalances annually weighted 2/3 by trading volume and 1/3 by world production and weight-caps are applied at the commodity, sector and group level for diversification. Roll period typically occurs from 6th-10th business day based on the roll schedule.

Indices are unmanaged, and one cannot invest directly in an index. Index returns do not reflect a deduction for fees or expenses.